A Survey on Recent Medical School Graduate Comfort With the Level 1 Milestones.

OBJECTIVE: The Next Accreditation System implemented 5 levels of milestones for orthopedic surgery residents in 2013. The Level 1 milestones were noted as those "expected of an incoming resident." While the milestones were intended for assessing resident progression and readiness for independent practice, this designation can also be used to assess how well prepared graduating medical students are for beginning an orthopedic surgery residency. The primary objective of this paper is to measure recent medical school graduate comfort with the Level 1 milestones. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In June 2015, the program directors for the Midwest Orthopaedic Surgical Skills (MOSS) Consortium affiliated residency programs were sent an online survey for distribution to the recent medical school graduates who matched at their respective programs. The survey was about recent graduate comfort with the Level 1 milestone handles associated with 16 orthopedic milestones spanning multiple subspecialties. Responses were grouped based on comfort with individual milestone handles with orthopedic conditions (e.g., carpal tunnel) or with broader categories spanning orthopedic milestones (e.g., imaging). RESULTS: In all, 66 of 112 graduates (58.9%) responded. Of 60 milestone handles surveyed, respondents were "Comfortable" with an average of 31.6 ± 14.2 handles with some conditions performing much better than others. The median "Comfortable" response rate was 31 handles. The 8 broader categories had "Comfortable" response rates between 35% and 70%. All 8 orthopedic conditions had significantly higher "Comfortable" response rates for "Evaluation & Knowledge" handles than for "Decision Making & Treatment" handles. CONCLUSIONS: Most recent medical student graduates who matched into an orthopedic surgery residencies are only comfortable with about half of the Level 1 milestone handles even though they are expected to meet the Level 1 milestones upon beginning residency. This finding suggests the development of an assessment based on the Level 1 milestones would be appropriate to better inform both graduate and undergraduate medical education in orthopedic surgery.

Preferably Not My Surgery: A Survey of Patient and Family Member Comfort with Concurrent and Overlapping Surgeries.

BACKGROUND: Concurrent and overlapping surgical procedures are a timely topic. The 2 largest publications on the topic were limited to a journalistic overview and a government committee report. Since then, a recent survey of paid individuals found that they disapprove of overlapping surgical procedures in many cases. Still, we are aware of no work that specifically polled patients and their family members about their beliefs on concurrent and overlapping surgical procedures. We hypothesized that patients and family members will be uncomfortable with 1 surgeon performing overlapping or concurrent surgical procedures. METHODS: A survey about concurrent and overlapping surgical procedures was given to 200 patients and their family members at a single, urban academic medical center. Participants were asked to respond to questions about their knowledge of concurrent and overlapping surgical procedures, their comfort with different surgical scenarios, and their beliefs on possible reasons for such surgical scenarios. Individuals were approached about the survey until 200 patients and family members responded. RESULTS: On average, respondents were neutral with surgical procedures involving overlap of 2 noncritical portions and were not comfortable with overlap involving a critical portion of 1 or both surgical procedures. They agreed that hospitals allow overlapping surgical procedures to increase revenue. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing a surgical procedure at an academic medical center and their family members were neutral or uncomfortable with concurrent or overlapping surgical procedures, affirming the hypothesis. Knowing these preferences is relevant to surgeons' practices and to informed consent discussions. It appears beneficial for surgeons to address the advantages and disadvantages of overlapping surgical procedures with their patients if applicable.

Sox2 regulates Müller glia reprogramming and proliferation in the regenerating zebrafish retina via Lin28 and Ascl1a.

Sox2 is a well-established neuronal stem cell-associated transcription factor that regulates neural development and adult neurogenesis in vertebrates, and is one of the critical genes used to reprogram differentiated cells into induced pluripotent stem cells. We examined if Sox2 was involved in the early reprogramming-like events that Müller glia undergo as they upregulate many pluripotency- and neural stem cell-associated genes required for proliferation in light-damaged adult zebrafish retinas. In the undamaged adult zebrafish retina, Sox2 is expressed in Müller glia and a subset of amacrine cells, similar to other vertebrates. Following 31 h of light damage, Sox2 expression significantly increased in proliferating Müller glia. Morpholino-mediated knockdown of Sox2 expression resulted in decreased numbers of proliferating Müller glia, while induced overexpression of Sox2 stimulated Müller glia proliferation in the absence of retinal damage. Thus, Sox2 is necessary and sufficient for Müller glia proliferation. We investigated the role of Wnt/ß-catenin signaling, which is a known regulator of sox2 expression during vertebrate retinal development. While ß-catenin 2, but not ß-catenin 1, was necessary for Müller glia proliferation, neither ß-catenin paralog was required for sox2 expression following retinal damage. Sox2 expression was also necessary for ascl1a (neurogenic) and lin28a (reprogramming) expression, but not stat3 expression following retinal damage. Furthermore, Sox2 was required for Müller glial-derived neuronal progenitor cell amplification and expression of the pro-neural marker Tg(atoh7:EGFP). Finally, loss of Sox2 expression prevented complete regeneration of cone photoreceptors. This study is the first to identify a functional role for Sox2 during Müller glial-based regeneration of the vertebrate retina.

It All Depends on Who Does What: A Survey of Patient and Family Member Comfort With Surgical Trainees Operating.

OBJECTIVE: To measure patient and family member comfort with surgical trainees of varying levels performing different portions of surgery. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: An electronic survey dividing surgery into 6 steps (prepping and positioning, initial incision, deep dissection, critical portions, deep suturing, and closing incision), differentiating surgical trainees by 4 levels of experience (medical student, intern, resident, and fellow), and specifying whether or not an attending surgeon is in the operating room (OR) was given to 200 patients and family members in the surgical waiting area of a single academic medical center. Responses were on a 7-point Likert scale from "Not Comfortable at All" to "Completely Comfortable". RESULTS: Patient and family member comfort significantly increased as trainee experience increased. It reached a nadir for all trainees performing "critical portions" of surgery. However, their average response was "Comfortable" for residents and fellows performing any surgical step when the attending surgeon is present in the OR. The percentage of "Comfortable" responses was significantly lower for all trainee levels performing any surgical step when the attending surgeon is absent from the OR. CONCLUSIONS: Patient and family member comfort with surgical trainees operating varies based on the trainee's level of experience, the step the trainee performs, and whether or not the attending surgeon is present in the OR. Patients and family members are on average "Comfortable" with surgical residents and fellows performing any surgical step when the attending surgeon is present.

A multi-institutional study of perioperative and functional outcomes for pediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic Mitrofanoff appendicovesicostomy.

BACKGROUND: Robotic techniques are increasingly being used for reconstructive procedures in the pediatric population. OBJECTIVE: The present study reported the functional and perioperative outcomes of a multi-institutional cohort of pediatric patients who underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopic Mitrofanoff appendicovesicostomy (RALMA). STUDY DESIGN: Pediatric patients who underwent RALMA at five different centers were included. Positioning is shown (Summary Figure). Demographics were gathered, and intraoperative parameters included concomitant procedures, detrusor tunnel length, estimated blood loss (EBL) and operative time. Perioperative outcomes included length of hospital stay (LOS), morphine use and 30-day complications. Outcomes were reported in terms of stomal continence and surgical revisions. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients with a mean age of 10.4 ± 4.0 years were included in the analysis. Median follow-up was 29.5 months (IQR 11.8-45.0). Bladder augmentation was performed concomitantly in 15 (17%) patients, and bladder neck procedures in 34 (39%). Mean detrusor tunnel length was 3.9 ± 1.0 cm, EBL was 54 ± 70 ml, and operative time was 424 ± 120 min. Postoperatively, mean LOS was 5.2 ± 2.8 days. Patients who underwent concomitant augmentation had higher EBL and operative times (both P < 0.05). At 90 days, complications occurred in 26 patients (29.5%) with six Clavien grade ≥3 (6.8%). During follow-up, 11 (12.5%) patients required appendicovesicostomy revision. Regarding functional outcomes, 75 (85.2%) patients were initially continent. After additional procedures, 81 (92.0%) patients were continent at last follow-up. DISCUSSION: Compared to previous open series, initial stomal continence rates with RALMA were acceptable, with a minority of patients requiring subsequent procedures to manage complications and achieve continence. CONCLUSION: RALMA is safe and effective in a pediatric population with regard to perioperative complications and stomal continence.